
I'm prefacing this piece, because of its age. I wrote this while still a member of the Anglican Church, for our parish newsletter. Our newsletter was our pride. At the time the following article was written, it had been named one of the top twelve parish newsletters in the Anglican Church. The critical nature of the piece was not new to our parish. I had written dozens of similar articles, some directed at the Anglican Church, some at the Roman Catholic Church and some, just at the Church, generally. These articles had been welcomed, enjoyed and widely debated in my parish. At the time of publication, though, the Editor got cold feet and declined to print my thoughts. A second parish (also in the Anglo-Catholic tradition) also so declined. The article was deemed too inflammatory due to strained relations between old guard parishioners and those of us who were welcoming change.
As the Vatican comes under increasing scrutiny for its sheltering and enabling of paedophiles, though, I am throwing this piece to the four winds of the internet and hoping it will rattle the gates of not only that particular Hell, but others like it. Now that the shit is hitting the fan, maybe some of it will serve as fertilizer for new growth in the Church: a decrepit and increasingly irrelevant Institution.
In Thought, Word and Deed
“If the word has the potency to revive and make us free,
it has also the power to bind, imprison and destroy.”
-Ralph Ellison
A young man walks into a bar in New Bedford, Connecticut. He asks, his face inscrutable; dead:
“This a gay bar?”
So, the bartender says, “Yeah, that’s right.”
So then the young man plunges a hatchet into the guy next to him, and that’s not all. He shoots him and then he shoots two other guys. Then Jacob Robida flees into the night, leaving the injured to bleed and the uninjured to their shock. When police catch up with the eighteen year old, he shoots his female companion at point blank range and then, himself. That’s the end of the story. It’s the terminus of what started out as a thought, evolved into a word (or a collection of words), exchanged or overheard; maybe read. Next a recoiling in the mind, as thought collected on thought and gathered together into a complex of revulsion. Physical symptoms: a welling up in the visceral depths of the body, tightness in the throat, abdominal spasms. A sneer. More words. Finally, the act of violence explodes and blood is spilled. Three people injured. Two dead. There is no mystery here, but people will consider the images on television of the police cars and the dingy sign over the door of the innocuous little bar and ask:
“How do these things happen? What’s the matter with people? Are they out of their minds?”
Simply: thoughts become words and words become acts. The punch line of a joke turns into a scar that will never heal. Just as the larva of a ladybug moves into the stage of pupation, growing ripe and fat on the leaf of a tree, emerging finally as the familiar red and black insect we’re all so fond of, violence has a life cycle. It is not begotten in a cylinder of glass, springing into the world fully formed. It develops in the same deliberate way the pleasant ladybug does. That’s what’s the matter with people. They are not out of their minds. They are only living out the imperative of a race that loves nothing more than a scapegoat. A scapegoat is a vacation from the reality of our human nature. The projection of our most base and foul inner gremlins, the scapegoat is something to lash out at with pointed sticks and spit on. We send this miserable creature out into the wilderness to the demon, Azazel, just as the ancient Israelites did, but it keeps coming back. Head down, snorting and huffing, it charges at us with its great, curled horns. How we hate and fear it. We make the ritual of its banishment as painful, humiliating and public as possible, hoping the damnable thing will finally die out there, leaving a whitened pile of bones, picked clean by vultures, bleached in the relentless desert sun. It never happens. Just when we think it’s gone forever, those familiar hoof beats break our self-satisfied silence. It’s back. The sweat stands out on our brows as we plan the next ritual, collecting pointy sticks in a big, menacing pile and saliva in the back of our throats.
The new Bishop of Rome has ascended to the throne of Peter at a time when its foundations are being shaken by wave upon wave of scandal. In the United States, even Cardinals have not been immune to this seismic rattling. Bernard Cardinal Law enjoyed a feather soft landing (after blowing across the ocean from embattled Boston), alighting as archpriest of Santa Maria Maggiore in Rome, arguably one of the most coveted placements in the Roman Church. The fact that he was, upon his resignation, ensconced in this prestigious post by the late John Paul II, has enraged American victims of priestly sexual abuse, as they argue Law was instrumental in the sheltering of criminally abusive clergy in his Archdiocese. As these victims watched, Cardinal Law was presented at the centre of the ecclesiastical pageantry accompanying the laying to rest of one Bishop of Rome and the enthronement of another. Cardinal Law, from the white hot centre of this scandal, floated safely to earth, alighting in the velvet coziness of the Roman Curia to preside at one of nine Papal Funeral Masses, televised around the world.
But somebody, surely, must be blamed? There must be justice, but if the Byzantine structures of ecclesiastical power are to be defended, the piper won’t be paid by anyone in a red cassock. Better a scapegoat than a Cardinal.
Once a seismic engineer, always a seismic engineer, for that was the vocation the new Bishop of Rome practiced as John Paul II’s doctrinal enforcer. As the ground wiggled and tectonic plates creaked, the Pope formerly known as Cardinal Ratzinger busily measured how best to mitigate the damage. The foundations may have oscillated as the earth moved under them, but the Church of Rome was not to be moved on Josephum’s unwavering watch. Now enthroned, the vigilant engineer is no less attentive. So, in November of 2005, the Vatican’s Congregation for Catholic Education published the “Instruction Concerning the Criteria for the Discernment of Vocations with regard to Persons with Homosexual Tendencies in view of their Admission to the Seminary and to Holy Orders”. As daunting a title as any to issue from the labyrinthine halls of the Vatican, this document should be cause for great alarm among the Faithful. Many of these Faithful will be neither surprised nor particularly moved by the Instruction’s attack on homosexuals. It’s all been said before: “intrinsically immoral”, “contrary to natural law”, “objectively disordered”. These dusty old chestnuts have been rolled out from under the hulking cupola of San Pietro many times before, as the current Bishop of Rome girded it against the terrible rumblings roiling beneath. They are nothing new. What is new (and unheard of) is under Section 3: Discernment by the Church Concerning the Suitability of Candidates:
“The spiritual director has the obligation to evaluate all the qualities of the candidate’s personality and to make sure that he does not present disturbances of a sexual nature, which are incompatible with the priesthood. If a candidate practices homosexuality or presents deep-seated homosexual tendencies, his spiritual director as well as his confessor have the duty to dissuade him in conscience from proceeding towards ordination.”
The San Diego Union-Tribune reports that “…some priests are shocked by (this) easily overlooked clause”, and further that “These priests said this would turn the confessional and spiritual counseling sessions…into…tool(s) for weeding out gays from seminaries”. As the ground thunders, priests are shuffled from parish to parish and Cardinals are shuffled clear across the ocean. The scapegoat paws the ground, snorting and huffing as an angry crowd gathers, sticks in hand and phlegm in windpipe. Even at the expense of a Sacrament of the Church, the scapegoat will be driven out into the arms of Azazel, beaten and spat upon to atone for the sins of others. Unfortunately for our seismic engineer, measuring and mitigating in his pristine, white frock and Prada loafers, other eyes are watching and they are just as vigilant. Fr. Bob Hoatson, a New Jersey priest, has been paying close attention.
In a suit against Cardinal Edward Egan and “nine other Catholic officials and institutions”, reports the Village Voice, Hoatson claims “…a pattern of retaliation and harassment that began after (he) alleged a cover-up of clergy abuse…and started helping victims”. Hoatson further “…alleges that Egan is ‘actively homosexual’, and that he has ‘personal knowledge of this’”. The suit goes on to identify two other clergy in the region; Bishop of Albany, Howard Hubbard, and Archbishop of Newark, John Meyers, as “actively gay”. Fr. Hoatson’s problem is not with the “…consensual, adult private sexual behaviour” of these episcopal leaders. What bothers him to the point that he will risk everything (he was placed on a leave of absence prohibiting him from “publicly presenting himself as a priest”, only four days after filing suit) is that these leaders have shielded pedophiles for fear of being exposed as homosexuals. Fr. Hoatson’s lawsuit states that the closeted sexuality of these Princes of the Church “…has compromised defendants’ ability to supervise and control predators”. As a result, Fr. Hoatson has been “…gotten rid of because (he is) trying to get rid of the cycle of sexual disorder in the church”. Only four days after filing this lawsuit, Fr. Hoatson was functionally defrocked. Cardinal Law, who resigned under compulsion of a no confidence motion filed by 50 priests, now presides comfortably and prestigiously over one of the most important seats in the Roman Church. After shuffling predators like Paul Shanley and John Geoghan around his Archdiocese in an effort to shield them, he repented only of a “…failure to keep proper records”.
Michael Mendola, of Dignity New York (part of an international network of LGBT Roman Catholics) claims that many gay priests have maintained a “…veil of silence” in the matter of bishops’ sex lives due to their fear of “jeopardiz(ing) their relationships with the dioceses”. Yet he warns they are “…tired of the way the Vatican has pinned blame for the clergy-abuse crisis on homosexuals and the way far-right Catholic groups have tried to purge the church of gays”, using this crisis as an altar for their pile of pointy sticks. They can only be encouraged by the fact that the Diocese of Albany was so anxious to answer allegations by Fr. Hoatson against Bishop Hubbard, that they spent $2.2 million USD to engage the services of former federal prosecutor Mary Jo White to produce a White Paper in the matter. The Paper in question took White only four months to produce and fully exonerated Bp. Hubbard of engaging in “…sexual relationships with several men, including a teenage street hustler and three diocesan priests”. The problem is, Fr. Hoatson won’t go away. Pricey White Paper, allegations of “malingering” and functional dismissal; none of these have dissuaded Fr. Hoatson from his belief that he has been called to address the Roman Catholic Church’s entrenched hypocrisy in matters sexual. As stated above, Fr. Hoatson is unmoved by what people do in the privacy of their bedrooms. What concerns him is that the church, in its efforts to maintain the unnatural novelty of priestly celibacy and in its anxiety to squash any evidence that it is not strictly maintained, has created a culture of secrecy, dysfunction and fear from which has emerged a monstrous complex of pedophilia that it can no longer shield from a watching world.
As this monstrosity emerges into the light of day, with the help of people like Fr. Hoatson, the scapegoat makes its miserable way to the blistering desert, into the waiting arms of Azazel. With every Instruction from the Vatican, every pronouncement from the Bishop of Rome, each denial and obfuscation, another blow falls on its back, matted with the spit of people projecting their own worst fears, not about others, but about themselves. And lest we Anglicans think ourselves above the brandishing of pointy sticks, I submit the recent public endorsement of the Nigerian government’s attack on the civil rights of its gay citizens by Archbishop Peter Akinola. It is now against the law for Nigerian gays to assemble, speak in public places or in any media, or to petition the government in any way. Further, Nigeria’s law states that any person involved in the“…sustenance, procession or meetings, publicity and public show of same sex amorous relationship directly or indirectly” is subject to five years’ imprisonment. By speaking in favour of this legislation, which violates Articles 18 – 20 of the United Nations Universal Declaration on Human Rights, Akinola has, in the words of John Bryson Chane, Bishop of Washington, underwritten “…institutionalized bigotry”. Lest we forget, he has also abdicated from the Newry Primates’ Statement, which condemns the “victimization or diminishment of (gay people)” as “anathema”. The Inclusive Church organization has written to the Archbishop of Canterbury to request that Akinola be censured for “…encouraging the State to engage in active persecution of gay people and those who speak for them”. The letter, sent February 21 has yet to receive an official response.
Jacob Robida was not born in a test tube. He was born of a woman, after the manner of human flesh, just like the rest of us. He was not intrinsically immoral, any more than you or I. Any one of us can have a thought, hear a word, commit an act. We can also think that thought, speak that word and provoke that act. This is the horrible dilemma of being human. We are created well. We become sick in an environment of abundant, free-floating thoughts and words capable of mestastasizing, as they fix to some of us; or even most of us. The problem is that Jacob Robida heard a word that resonated within his troubled soul. We all hear things at different frequencies it seems, depending on where the ripped and tattered parts of our interior lives are most raw. For Jacob Robida, that word was a panacaea for hurt, of whatever kind; a salve for disappointment, real or perceived. That word, born out of a thought somewhere, rolled around and around, bouncing off and adhering to other words, irritating old wounds, embedding itself in the fissures of a spirit that couldn’t make sense of all the confusion; the complexities of this life. Jacob Robida took his pointed stick and beat the horned beast of his own tortured humanity. He spit on it, looked at what he’d done and ran away, into the night. But that beast is only on its knees, because it just won’t die. Long after Jacob Robida’s name has been forgotten as another casualty of this uncertain and angry world, the scapegoat will still be standing at the margins, head down, pawing at the dust, challenging us to hit it again and again. What will this Church answer when it beholds, finally, that circlet of thorns on its horned head?